Aims of the study
These were the aims of the FDCS during its
first phase of funding:
1.
Describe the long-term changes in specific oral health outcomes.
2. Describe the demand
for specific dental services over time.
3. Determine the
predisposing, enabling, and oral health correlates of demand for specific
dental services.
4. Determine the
behavioral (especially dental care use behavior), attitudinal and socioeconomic
correlates of
longitudinal oral health outcomes.
In 1999, we successfully competed for
funding to extend the FDCS to 72 months of data gathering. Building upon
knowledge gained from the first four years of the FDCS, we refined and extended
our aims to test 8 new hypotheses:
1. To test the
hypothesis that self-reported dimensions of oral health are more predictive of
incident dental care use
during a 6-year period in diverse populations than measures determined by
direct clinical examination.
2. To test the hypothesis that certain self-reported
dimensions of oral health (self-reported oral disease & tissue
damage, oral pain & discomfort, oral disadvantage due to disease &
tissue damage, oral disadvantage due to
pain, and perceived need for dental care) are more predictive of incident
dental care use during a 6-year
period in diverse populations than other self-reported dimensions (oral
functional limitation, oral disadvantage
due to functional limitation, self-rated oral health, satisfaction with oral
health, and satisfaction with chewing
ability).
3. To test the hypothesis that dental care use during
a 6-year period in diverse populations is more strongly
associated with recovery (i.e, moving from a state of
decrement in oral health into a state of improved oral
health) than it is with prevention of onset.
4. To test the hypothesis that dental care use during
a 6-year period in diverse populations is more strongly
associated with recovery when certain oral health dimensions are the outcomes
of interest (self-reported oral
disease & tissue damage, oral pain & discomfort, oral disadvantage due
to disease & tissue damage, oral
disadvantage due to pain, and perceived need for dental care) than when other
dimensions are the outcomes
of interest (oral functional limitation, oral disadvantage due to function
limitation, self-rated oral health,
satisfaction with oral health, and satisfaction with chewing ability).
5. To test the hypothesis that “acute care”
dental services are the most strongly associated with recovery due to
dental care, followed by “secondary care” services (restorative
services, non-pain-related surgical services,
and rehabilitative services), which in turn are more strongly associated with
recovery than
"primary care” dental services.
6. To test the hypothesis that “problem-oriented
dental attenders” are most likely to seek
dental care in response
to change in dimensions of oral health that are the most strongly associated
with recovery due to dental care
(self-reported oral disease & tissue damage, oral pain & discomfort,
oral disadvantage due to disease & tissue
damage, oral disadvantage due to pain, and perceived need for dental care).
7. To test the hypothesis that “problem-oriented
dental attenders” are most likely to seek
specific dental services
(“acute care” and “secondary care” services) that are
the most strongly associated with recovery due to dental
care than those services that are not (“primary care” services).
8. To test the hypothesis that “regular dental attendance”
during a 6-year period is associated with improvement
and/or maintenance in clinical measures of oral disease and in each
self-reported dimension of oral health
(oral disease & tissue damage, oral pain & discomfort, oral functional
limitation, oral disadvantage, and
self-rated oral health), while “problem-oriented dental attendance”
is associated with decline in these
measures in diverse patient populations.